Skip to main content
· 8/14/2002

Pamela Wilkins, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross

Citations

  • 299 F.3d 945
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2872
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16434
  • 2002 WL 1842253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that chronic fatigue syndrome is difficult to diagnose and treat, and may not always be disabling, and criticizing lack of objective medical evidence as the primary reason to deny disability benefits based on chronic fatigue syndrome
  • finding a contractual limitation in a plan governed by ERISA was enforceable where authorized by state law
  • finding by the Eighth Circuit that a three-year contractual limitations period to bring suit for ERISA benefits reasonable, and applicable
  • upholding a contractual limitations period in an ERISA plan so long as it is not unreasonably short
  • finding that ERISA claim accrued at time of initial denial
  • applying three-year statute of limitations specified under the terms of the plan as enforceable contract under Arkansas law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Beam, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.