Pamela Sue Wolfe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by requiring all estates to post a bond to make a section 6166 election regardless of the facts before him, the Commissioner was adopting a bright-line policy that trumped the exercise of his discretion
• finding that where the Commissioner is required to exercise discretion, the Commissioner may not avoid this responsibility by imposing a universal rule that is contrary to the intent of Congress
• finding that where the Commissioner is required to exercise discretion, the Commissioner may not avoid this responsibility by imposing a universal rule that is contrary to the intent of Congress
• finding that where the Commissioner is required to exercise discretion, the Commissioner may not avoid this responsibility by imposing a universal rule that is contrary to the intent of Congress
• noting the Commissioner’s concession that “‘a discretionary act * * * could only be subject to an abuse of discretion review’ ”
• noting the Commissioner's concession that \'a discretionary act * * * could only be subject to an abuse of discretion review'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).