Pamela Randel v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If at least one element of the plaintiff’s case is not supported by the evidence, then a directed verdict is appropriate . . . .”
• “Missouri cases do indeed hold that where a public entity exercises ‘exclusive control and possession’ over property, the property will be viewed as ‘a public entity’s property’ for purposes of section 537.600.1(2).”
• “Missouri cases do indeed hold that where a public entity exercises ‘exclusive control and possession’ over property, the property will be viewed as ‘a public entity’s property’ for purposes of section 537.600.1(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).