PAMELA L. v. Farmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a wife who invited and encouraged children to visit her premises even though she knew that her husband had molested women and children in the past and might do so again could be held liable in negligence
• holding wife unreasonably exposed neighbor’s children to danger because she invited the children over in spite of knowing her husband had molested children in the past
• finding that wife could be held liable on a negligence theory for inviting the minor plaintiffs to her home when it was reasonably foreseeable that her husband would molest them if left alone with them
• stating that a wife, who knew that her husband had a history of molesting children, could be liable for placing minors in danger by encouraging them to use her home and swimming pool while she was at work and her husband was home alone
• where wife knew that her husband was a sex offender and was inviting minors home while she was at work, wife had a duty to warn minor licensees of the danger
• where wife knew that her husband was a sex offender and was inviting minors home while she was at work, wife had a duty to warn minor licensees of the danger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).