Skip to main content
· 2/24/1992

Pamela Kotcher and Barbara Davis, Pamela Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., and Herbert Trageser

Citations

  • 957 F.2d 59
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2620
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,312
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer is not liable for supervisor’s misconduct unless it provided no reasonable avenue for complaint or knew of supervisor’s misconduct but did nothing about it
  • holding that isolated incidents or episodic conduct will not support a Title VII claim because the “incidents must be repeated and continuous; isolated acts or occasional episodes will not merit relief”
  • finding that a supervisor who often pretended to masturbate and ejaculate at an employee behind her back had created a hostile work environment
  • finding that a supervisor who often pretended to masturbate and ejaculate at an employee behind her back had created a hostile work environment
  • noting that the supervisor was the highest ranking company official at the employment site, but did not occupy a position in the upper echelon’s of the company’s management
  • noting that the supervisor was the highest ranking company official at the employment site, but did not occupy a position in the upper echelon's of the company's management

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Newman, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.