Pamela J. Burks v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Marcia L. Traska, and Mary P. Forlenza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a coworker cannot be similarly situated if they do not commit comparable policy violations
• holding that a coworker cannot be similarly situated if they do not commit comparable policy violations
• holding that relevant factors include “whether the employees reported to the same supervisor, whether they were subject to the same standards and whether they had comparable education, experience, and qualification”
• holding that evidence that plaintiff taught effectively in prior years was irrelevant
• noting that similarly situated employees are those that are “directly comparable to her in all material respects”
• explaining that plaintiff may not establish substantial limitation in major life activity by submitting only general information about medical condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).