Pam, S.P.A., and Jcm, Ltd. v. United States, and A. Zerega's & Sons, Dakota Growers Pasta Co., New World Pasta Co., and American Italian Pasta Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenger must show substantial prejudice regardless of whether the agency rule confers important procedural benefits
• requiring a showing of substantial prejudice when Commerce violated its own regulation that required it to give notice to a foreign exporter
• requiring a showing of substantial prejudice when Commerce violated its own regulation that required it to give notice to a foreign exporter
• a 17-day delay in notice between a request for review and an initiation did not prejudice the reviewed entity
• failure to serve foreign producer with request for review, but producer received actual and constructive notice of the proceedings and received multiple extensions of time during the proceedings to respond
• harm caused by a few weeks’ delay in notification remedied by subsequent extensions of time for filing deadlines did not amount to substantial prejudice, and noting plaintiff did not claim its ability to respond to and defend its interests were impeded.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).