Skip to main content
· 2/4/1991

Palyok v. Borough of West Mifflin

Citations

  • 586 A.2d 366
  • 526 Pa. 324
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a borough's calculation of a police officer's monthly pension benefit was an adjudication appealable under the Local Agency Law
  • holding that police officer was entitled to retirement benefits based on total compensation received, including overtime pay, inasmuch as the work he performed in exchange for the overtime pay was the same as the work he performed in exchange for his basic salary
  • interpreting “salary” in pension statute to include overtime pay, in part because retirement plan contributions were deducted from the overtime pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.