Palo Duro Pipeline Co., Inc. v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cash amounts of settlement agreements were not discoverable because these amounts were irrelevant to the claims and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence
• ‘We do not, however, find the cash amounts contained in the settlement agreements to be relevant to the issue of conspiracy nor would disclosing the cash amounts be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).