Palmosina v. Laidlaw Transit Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absent express legislation to the contrary, the legislature’s elimination of the workers’ compensation carrier’s traditional right of sub-rogation did not by itself preclude an employee’s recovery of amounts paid by workers’ compensation in third-party litigation
• MVFRL as it appeared in 1989 permitted a pedestrian employee to effect a double recovery from a third-party tortfeasor who struck pedestrian with a bus, even though pedestrian had previously been paid benefits by her employer’s workers’ compensation carrier
• MVFRL as it appeared in 1989 permitted a pedestrian employee to effect a double recovery from a third-party tortfeasor who struck pedestrian with a bus, even though pedestrian had previously been paid benefits by her employer's workers' compensation carrier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).