Palmore v. State
Citations
- 65 Fla. 539
- 62 So. 581
Syllabus
<p>1. Assignments of error not argued may be treated as abandoned.</p> <p>2. A motion for a new trial is not a part of tbe record proper, but must be embodied in the bill of exceptions, together with the ruling thereon and the exception to such ruling, in order to present to the appellate court for consideration an assignment of error based upon the denial of such motion.</p> <p>3. Assignments of error based upon the exclusion of proffered testimony, in order to be available, must be so presented to an appellate court as to make it appear that such excluded testimony was relevant and material, or otherwise proper to be admitted.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alexander v. RhineSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-08-09· cited 11×
- Revell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-04-11· cited 7×
- Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-03-13· cited 6×
- Granquist v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-06-14· cited 6×
- Fortner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-02-25· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Boykin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 30×
- McKinnon v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 29×
- Bell v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 28×
- McCall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 19×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 15×
- Covington v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 11×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.