· 10/3/1985
Palmetto Dunes Resort v. Brown
Citations
- 336 S.E.2d 15
- 287 S.C. 1
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding because restrictive covenants are contractual in nature, the paramount rule of construction, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the parties as determined from the whole document, is applied to restrictive covenants
- “[A]lthough people may reasonably differ as to whether a house is aesthetically appropriate, the covenant is unambiguous in leaving this solitary judgment to Palmetto Dunes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.