Palmer v. University of Medicine and Dentistry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the plaintiff is the master of the complaint” (internal quotation omitted)
• holding that Holmes bars removal by cross-claimant
• applying the well-pleaded complaint rule and finding that a federal cross-claim asserting a constitutional violation did not confer subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).