Palmer v. Protrka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when difficulties in personal relationships between cotenants make co-occupancy impossible, the excluded co-tenant is entitled to the rental value of their interest in the property
• “When marital difficulties make . . . co-occupancy impossible, . . . [e]ach [spouse] should therefore be entitled to one half the rental value of the property].]”
• if the value of property held by cotenants is enhanced by improvements, the cotenant improving the property should be credited with the amount representing the increase in value of the other cotenant’s interest
• where the wife supplied the consideration
• where the wife supplied the consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).