Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that SCR 182 prohibits attorney contact with certain employees of a represented company, those who are most likely to possess confidential information
• holding that SCR 182 prohibits attorney contact with certain employees of a represented company, those who are most likely to possess confidential information
• noting that organizational 26 parties “must act through their directors and employees”
• “We conclude 25 that the managing-speaking agent test . . . best balances the policies at stake when considering 26 what contact with an organization’s representatives is appropriate.”
• “Which employees have ‘speaking’ authority is 18 determined on a case-by-case basis according to the particular employee’s position and 19 duties and the jurisdiction’s agency and evidence law.”
• rephrasing certified questions under NRAP 5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).