Palmer v. Pioneer Hotel & Casino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the third category in the commentary “is a reference to Rule 801(d)(2)(D) of the Federal Rules Evidence.”
• applying test to more clearly define former comment’s “managerial” category, but reasoning that other categories of former comment still apply
• noting witness’s “ability” to make admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).