Palmer v. Pinkham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “CR 32.01’s allowance of the use of the deposition for ‘any purpose’ is not expansive and cannot justify the admission of testimony that could not be admitted through a live witness.”
• “CR 32.01’s allowance of the use of the deposition for ‘any purpose’ is not expansive and cannot justify the admission of testimony that could not be admitted through a live witness.”
• “Ultimately, this was an eight-day trial, about which the Appellee complains only of a single five-word sentence. Such an isolated remark, especially when balanced against more fully developed testimony from other experts, can have little if any prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).