· 3/20/1984
Palmer v. Neal
Citations
- 602 F. Supp. 882
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the particular problem facing the inventor must be considered in determining non-obviousness
- the particular problem facing the inventor must be considered in determining obviousness
- discussing role of PTO’s prima facie case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.