Palmer v. Mahin
Citations
- 120 F. 737
- 57 C.C.A. 41
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4527
Syllabus
<p>1. Libel — What Charges are Libelous Per Se — Compensatory Damages.</p> <p>An unprivileged publication, in writing or print, of a false charge that another is guilty of a crime, or of a false charge that tends to expose another to public hatred or contempt, is libelous per se; and such a publication entitles the victim of the libel to full compensation for the damages to his reputation, business, and feelings which it has caused, regardless of the intent or motive with which the publication was made.</p> <p>2. Same — Such a Publication Raises Conclusive Presumption of Damages, and the Only Question por the Jury is the Amount.</p> <p>The unprivileged publication of such charges raises a conclusive legal presumption that the victim has sustained some damages, and the only question for the jury is their amount.</p> <p>8. Same — Charge op Blackmailing and Extortion.</p> <p>The charge that one is a blackmailer, and has brought blackmailing suits to extort money wrongfully, is libelous on its face. So is the charge of inducing the publication of a libel in order to found suits upon it to extort money wrongfully.</p> <p>4. Same — Exemplary Damages — When Allowable.</p> <p>In addition to compensation for his actual loss, the jury may allow to the victim of a libel exemplary damages when- the publication was inspired by ill will or by a willful intent to injure, or was made in violation and in reckless disregard of the rights of the person defamed.</p> <p>5. Same — Matter in Mitigation — When Admissible.</p> <p>The publisher of such a libel may plead and prove that when he sent it forth he believed the statements it contained to be true, that he was then innocent of any intent to injure, or of any ill will towards his victim, or that he made the publication by mistake or inadvertently, for the purpose of mitigating the exemplary damages. But matter in mitigation of damages for the unprivileged publication of a libel is inadmissible to reduce or affect the compensatory dam
Judges: Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Afro-American Publishing Co., Inc. v. Eli Jaffe, T/a Douglas PharmacyD.C. Circuit· 1966-08-23· cited 158×
- Brogan v. Passaic Daily NewsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-06-25· cited 30×
- Maytag v. CumminsEighth Circuit· 1919-07-08· cited 25×
- Times-Dispatch Publishing Co. v. ZollSupreme Court of Virginia· 1927-09-29· cited 18×
- Dalton v. Calhoun County District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa· 1914-02-19· cited 14×
- Vanloon v. VanloonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1911-11-06· cited 12×
- Dorn & McGinty v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa· 1908-07-09· cited 9×
- Meriwether v. PublishersSupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-12-23· cited 8×
- Post Pub. Co. v. ButlerSixth Circuit· 1905-05-18· cited 7×
- Goolsby v. Forum Printing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1912-03-22· cited 3×
- Kraft v. New York Herald Co.S.D. New York· 1925-05-06· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lothrop v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1882-10-20· cited 37×
- Locke v. Chicago Chronicle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1899-01-27· cited 28×
- Times Pub. Co. v. CarlisleEighth Circuit· 1899-05-08· cited 28×
- Bigelow v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1886-01-06· cited 27×
- Malloy v. BennettS.D. New York· 1883-02-21· cited 5×
- Press Pub. Co. v. McDonaldSecond Circuit· 1896-04-06· cited 3×
- Edwards v. Kansas City Times Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1887-10-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.