Skip to main content
· 1/26/2010

Palmer v. Hendricks

Citations

  • 592 F.3d 386
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1683
  • 2010 WL 282086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treat- ing the objective reasonableness of a defendant’s belief that deadly force was necessary for self-defense as a jury question
  • neffective assistance claim that does not contain argument or evidence as to prejudice provides no basis for habeas relief
  • “AEDPA requires federal courts collaterally reviewing state proceedings to afford considerable deference to state courts’ legal and factual determinations.”
  • “Bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not afford a sufficient ground for an evidentiary hearing’ on a habeas petition” (quoting Campbell v. Burris, 515 F.3d 172, 184 (3d Cir. 2008)
  • courts may resolve a Strickland claim by concluding that prejudice has not been established
  • “bald assertions and conclusory allegations” cannot establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Fuentes, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.