· 1/26/2010
Palmer v. Hendricks
Citations
- 592 F.3d 386
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1683
- 2010 WL 282086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treat- ing the objective reasonableness of a defendant’s belief that deadly force was necessary for self-defense as a jury question
- neffective assistance claim that does not contain argument or evidence as to prejudice provides no basis for habeas relief
- “AEDPA requires federal courts collaterally reviewing state proceedings to afford considerable deference to state courts’ legal and factual determinations.”
- “Bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not afford a sufficient ground for an evidentiary hearing’ on a habeas petition” (quoting Campbell v. Burris, 515 F.3d 172, 184 (3d Cir. 2008)
- courts may resolve a Strickland claim by concluding that prejudice has not been established
- “bald assertions and conclusory allegations” cannot establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Fuentes, Aldisert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.