Palmer v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the claimant's disparate treatment argument \would have merit if claimant had alleged that enforcement of the company rules had been based on improper discrimination such as racial bias\
• stating that the claimant’s disparate treatment argument “would have merit if claimant had alleged that enforcement of the company rules had been based on improper discrimination such as racial bias”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Geisinger Health Plan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-02-05· cited 25×
• Langensiepen v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-01· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-25· cited 39×
• Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-29· cited 23×
• Schooley v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 8×