Skip to main content

Palmer v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 416 S.E.2d 52
  • 14 Va. App. 346
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 2672
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “concealment” is “admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt” (quoting Langhorne v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 97, 102 (1991))
  • upholding the admission of evidence of the defendant’s refusal to comply with a court order directing him to shave and cut his hair in order to facilitate possible eyewitness identification because the refusal “suggest[ed] an attempt at concealment”
  • an accused’s attempts to conceal the evidence of her crime are “admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself”
  • “[R]efusal to comply with the court order was a circumstance tending to show guilt and was properly considered by the trier of fact.”
  • “[I]t is today universally conceded that the fact of an accused’s flight . . . and related conduct are admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself.”
  • “[I]t is today universally conceded that the fact of an accused’s flight, . . . concealment, . . . and related conduct are admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.