Skip to main content
· 10/15/1883

Palmer v. Boorn

Citations

  • 80 Mo. 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence irrelevant where expert not able to link hair sample to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.