Supreme Court of Vermont· 7/17/1992
Palmer v. Bennington School District, Inc.
Citations
- 615 A.2d 498
- 159 Vt. 31
- 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1640
- 1992 Vt. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding school principal was a \public official\ based on principal's own admissions as to his authority
- discussing importance of education in preserving representa tive government and noting “state’s commitment to this essential government function”
- “Few courts have considered whether a school principal is a public official. Those that have are divided.”
- “[b]ecause of the crucial role of public education in American society, we agree with the courts holding that a principal is a public official”
- “Few courts have considered whether a school principal is a public official. Those that have are divided. Because of the crucial role of public education in American society, we agree with the courts holding that a principal is a public official.” (citations omitted)
- public elementary school principal is a public official
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 260×
- Brigham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-02-05· cited 64×
- Goodwin v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 30×
- Beeching v. LeveeIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-02-28· cited 23×
- Netherwood v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 1725Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-10-19· cited 20×
- East Canton Education Ass'n v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 18×
- Johnson v. Robbinsdale Independent School District No. 281D. Minnesota· 1993-07-29· cited 16×
- Williams v. Detroit Board of EducationE.D. Michigan· 2007-10-30· cited 6×
- Jee v. New York Post Co.New York Supreme Court· 1998-03-06· cited 5×
- Soojung Jang v. Trs. of St. Johnsbury Acad.D. Vermont· 2018-07-06· cited 4×
- Herrera v. Union No. 39 School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-08-04· cited 3×
- E. Canton Edn. Assn. v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 2×
- Herrera v. Union No. 39 School Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-08-04
- Brandon Darby v. the New York Times Company and James C. McKinley, Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-02-04
- McNulty v. KesslerMassachusetts Superior Court· 1995-04-03
- Collins v. Taos Board of EducationD. New Mexico· 2012-09-27
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1954-05-17· cited 3,819×
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 2,076×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 1,859×
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 1,111×
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 1,025×
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 738×
- Sugarman v. DougallSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 451×
- Ambach v. NorwickSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 255×
- Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-06· cited 207×
- Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-04· cited 111×
- Kapiloff v. DunnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-23· cited 57×
- Messier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 38×
- McCutcheon v. MoranAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-17· cited 36×
- Colombo v. Times-Argus Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1977-10-31· cited 34×
- State v. DeLaBruereSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-27· cited 33×
- Lorain Journal Co. Et Al. v. MilkovichSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 23×
- Rutz v. Essex Junction Prudential CommitteeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-01-27· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.