Skip to main content
· 5/13/1889

Palmer v. Arthur

Citations

  • 131 U.S. 60
  • 9 S. Ct. 649
  • 33 L. Ed. 87
  • 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1802

Syllabus

<p>It appearing that the alleged imperfections in the plaintiff’s petition were either obviated by subsequent pleadings or cured by the verdict, and that this writ of error was sued out for purposes of delay, the court affirms the judgment below with ten per cent damages, ihterest and costs.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.