Skip to main content
· 2/9/1998

Palmer v. Apfel

Citations

  • 995 F. Supp. 549
  • 1998 WL 88614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that hearing testimony fully supported the ALJ’s decision
  • “General or blanket objections do not comply with Rule 72(b) and need not be addressed by the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.