Skip to main content
· 2/8/1984

Palmer Ford, Inc. v. Wood

Citations

  • 471 A.2d 297
  • 298 Md. 484
  • 1984 Md. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that acquittal after trial is not in and of itself evidence of a lack of probable cause
  • stating that acquittal after trial is not in and of itself evidence of a lack of probable cause
  • explaining that where the material facts on which the defendants relied in initiating prosecution were not in dispute, whether those facts established probable cause was a question of law for the court
  • holding, with respect to the tort of abuse of process, that “there is no liability where the defendant has done nothing more than carry out the process to its authorized conclusion, even with bad intentions”
  • explaining that where the material facts on which the defendants relied in initiating prosecution were not in dispute, whether those facts established probable cause was a question of law for the court
  • whether the facts, as found by the trier of fact, in a malicious prosecution action show the absence or presence of probable cause is a question for the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.