Skip to main content
· 8/10/2011

Palmdale Hills Property, LLC v. Lehman Commerical Paper, Inc. (In Re Palmdale Hills Property, LLC)

Citations

  • 457 B.R. 29
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 3535
  • 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 136
  • 2011 WL 4435894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when there are two permissible views of the evidence, the bankruptcy court’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous
  • when there are 26 two permissible views of the evidence, the bankruptcy court’s 27 choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous
  • when there are two 11 permissible views of the evidence, the bankruptcy court's choice 12 between them cannot be clearly erroneous
  • whether a principal must expressly authorize its agent to file a proof of claim
  • invoking language of intent in order to determine parties’ intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirscher, Markell, and Hollowell, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.