Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere contentions without citation to - 21 - No. 1-23-1478 authority merit no consideration on appeal
• “ ‘The well established rule is that mere contentions, without argument or citation of authority, do not merit consideration on appeal.’ [Citation.]”
• “Contentions supported by some argument but by absolutely no authority do not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 341(h)(7)
• “ ‘[M]ere contentions, without argument or citation of authority, do not merit consideration on appeal.’ ” (quoting People v. Hood, 210 Ill. App. 3d 743, 746 (1991)
• in addition to services performed and amount of time expended, trial court should also consider skill and standing of attorney and “the usual and customary charges for comparable services”
• in addition to services performed and amount of time expended, trial court should also consider skill and standing of attorney and “the usual and customary charges for comparable services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).