Palm Beach Polo v. Village of Wellington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subsequent property owners were bound by prior owner’s agreement to restrict building density and preserve certain portions of land as a condition of the original zoning approval
• finding that a property owner could not show a “reasonable investment-backed expectation” for an existing use
• finding that a property owner could not show a \reasonable investment-backed expectation\ for an existing use
• affirming that a “takings” claim was not ripe for adjudication, given the landowner’s failure to present a meaningful application for amendment of the comprehensive plan
• affirming that a takings claim was not ripe for adjudication, given the landowner’s failure to present a meaningful application for amendment of the comprehensive plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).