Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating a district court’s failure to address a motion presented to it as an implicit denial of that motion
• noting 3 Mother argues on appeal that the services did correct the conditions. 4 The determination of futility is, by statute, for the district court. Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.301, subd. 8, 260.012 (a)(7
• “Specific information that clearly demonstrates the existence of a debatably meritorious [claim] satisfies this factor.” (quotation omitted)
• “Appellate courts cannot assume a district court erred by failing to address a motion, and silence on a motion is therefore treated as an implicit denial of the motion.”
• “Appellate courts cannot assume a district court erred by failing to address a motion, and silence on a motion is therefore treated as an implicit denial of the motion.”
• “Appellate courts cannot assume a district court erred by failing to address a motion, and silence on a motion is therefore treated as an implicit denial of the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).