Palisades Safety & Insurance v. Bastien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that husband’s material misrepresentation to carrier voided wife’s personal injury protection (PIP) benefits in part because she had occupied “unique position to be aware of’ husband’s actions
• holding that husband's material misrepresentation to carrier voided wife's personal injury protection (PIP) benefits in part because she had occupied \unique position to be aware of\ husband's actions
• noting that insurance company cannot “escape[ ] liability in respect of innocent, third-party members of the public whose protection is a paramount concern”
• noting that insurance company cannot “escape[] liability in respect of innocent, third-party members of the public whose protection is a paramount concern”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).