Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu Parish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court “erred in its failure to apply [the] presumption and thereby place upon plaintiffs the burden of proving a lack of relation between the rezoning at issue and the welfare of the . . . community.”
• “If it appears appropriate and well-founded concerns for the public could have been the motivation for the zoning ordinance, it will be upheld.”
• again refusing to adopt the \change or mistake\ rule, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that it had been rejected in the majority of jurisdictions which have considered it
• again refusing to adopt the \change or mistake\ rule, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that it had been rejected in the majority of jurisdictions which have considered it
• when the property of a zoning decision is debatable, it will be upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).