Palcsesz v. Midland Mutual Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ourts have been reluctant to apply judicial estoppel where a statement contains a legal conclusion, as distinguished from a purely factual inconsistency.” (citing Cleveland v. Policy Mgmt. Sys. Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999).
• explaining test for judicial estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).