Palazini v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for defendant when “[a]t best 23 [plaintiff’s] evidence merely suggests [] a weak possibility”
• “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party’s position is not sufficient.”
• “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmoving party’s position is not sufficient”
• “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmoving party’s position is not sufficient.”
• “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party’s 27 position is not sufficient.”
• “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party’s position is not sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).