Skip to main content
· 6/27/1979

Palamarg Realty Company v. Rehac

Citations

  • 404 A.2d 21
  • 80 N.J. 446
  • 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a court should decide a question of title ... in the way that will best support and maintain the integrity of the recording system”
  • expressing the purpose of the Recording Act and holding that title issues should be resolved so as to effectuate that purpose
  • noting a \subsequent purchaser will be bound only by those instruments A-2823-16 158 which can be discovered by a 'reasonable' search of the particular chain of title\
  • declining to address an issue with \potentially far-reaching effects in a factual vacuum.\
  • explaining the recording statutes have been \consistently interpreted to mean\ a \subsequent purchaser will be bound only by those instruments which can be discovered by a 'reasonable' search of the particular chain of title\
  • \a subsequent purchaser will be bound only by those instruments which can be discovered by a `reasonable' search of the particular chain of title\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mountain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.