Paladino v. Woodloch Pines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing plaintiffs minimal burden at this stage
• rejecting untimeliness argument when “Plaintiff’s procedural stance has been as a class action since the inception of this matter, evinced both by the Complaint and by conversations and correspondence with the Court”
• “[T]he Supreme Court has noted that the ‘details’ of notice should be left to the broad discretion of the trial court.”
• “[W]here a collective action under the FLSA that is based on the same set of facts has been approved, there is an inclination to grant class certification of state labor law claims.”
• “Courts also may permit limited discovery to facilitate notice” to FLSA collectives
• “[W]here a collective action under the FLSA that is based on the same set of facts has been approved, there is an inclination to grant class certification of state labor law claims.” (citing Ansoumana v. Gristede’s Operating Corp., 201 F.R.D. 81, 86 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).