· 6/12/2015
PALADINO, TESHA v. BERNARDINI, AMANDA
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “even the least touching with a deadly weapon or instrument is violent in nature,” and this “reasoning applies even after Johnson”
- concluding that it did not have to determine whether a battery with a deadly weapon statute was divisible because it was categorically a crime of violence
- concluding that it did not have to determine whether a battery with a deadly weapon statute was divisible because it was categorically a crime of violence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.