Skip to main content
· 6/12/2015

PALADINO, TESHA v. BERNARDINI, AMANDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “even the least touching with a deadly weapon or instrument is violent in nature,” and this “reasoning applies even after Johnson”
  • concluding that it did not have to determine whether a battery with a deadly weapon statute was divisible because it was categorically a crime of violence
  • concluding that it did not have to determine whether a battery with a deadly weapon statute was divisible because it was categorically a crime of violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.