Palacio v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Magistrate Judge’s denial of motion for pro bono counsel where plaintiff’s claims do “not justify using the scarce resource of volunteer lawyers.”
• denying plaintiff pro se “| leave to amend his complaint for a third time when “plaintiff has already had two chances to amend with specific instructions . . . on how to properly do so’
• “At least at this preliminary stage,” the “plaintiff may proceed under this due process claim. [The] [p]laintiff adequately alleges that he was not provided with a voucher, he was unable to learn of the procedures, and he was deprived of his property as a result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).