Pakdimounivong v. City of Arlington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers’ actions were not taken with conscious indifference or reckless disregard for safety of deceased when no evidence showed that officers did not care what happened to deceased
• holding that officers' actions were not taken with conscious indifference or reckless disregard for safety of deceased when no evidence showed that officers did not care what happened to deceased
• holding that officers’ actions were not taken with conscious indifference or reckless disregard for safety of deceased when no evidence showed that officers did not care what happened to deceased
• holding that there was no reversible error because the appellant failed to show that additional findings and conclusions were appropriate or that the trial court’s failure to make additional findings and conclusions prevented it from adequately presenting its argument on appeal
• officers were responding to an emergency situation in which suspect in patrol car tried to escape through back window
• improper application of leg restraints and handcuffs did not cause injury but “at most created a condition, a lack of restraint, that allowed Vattana to cause his own death”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).