Pajewski v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding State was not entitled to dismissal of a complaintjust by showing there was no insurance coverage, but also had to provide all facts regarding how the insurance coverage committee met its obligations under 18 Del. C. §§ 6501-6543 et seq.
• holding State was not entitled to dismissal of a complaint just by showing there was no insurance coverage, but also had to provide all facts regarding how the insurance coverage committee met its obligations under 18 Del. C. §§ 6501-6543 et seq.
• no standing because promisee owed no duty to third party beneficiary
• no standing because promisee owed no duty to third party beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).