Painter v. Painter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the clear and convincing standard is satisfied when there is “clear, positive, and convincing” evidence of adultery
• stating that “[c]are and circumspection should accompany consideration of the evidence” when adultery is alleged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dodge v. Dodge
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-05-06· cited 101×
• Seemann v. Seemann
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-04-24· cited 41×
• Watts v. Watts
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-05-27· cited 36×
• Hughes v. Hughes
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-08-01· cited 24×
• Alls v. Alls
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-06-13· cited 18×
• Dooley v. Dooley
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1981-06-12· cited 17×
• Romero v. Colbow
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-04-07· cited 10×
• McIlwain v. McIlwain
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-03-10· cited 4×
• Brooks v. Brooks
  Spotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1987-11-25
• Jordan v. Jordan
  Hanover County Circuit Court· 2010-03-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haskins v. Haskins
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1948-11-22· cited 26×
• Hudgins v. Hudgins
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1943-01-18· cited 14×
• Colbert v. Colbert
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1934-06-14· cited 11×
• Plattner v. Plattner
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1960-11-28· cited 6×