South Dakota Supreme Court· 9/1/1999
Paint Brush Corp. v. Neu
Citations
- 1999 SD 120
- 599 N.W.2d 384
- 1999 S.D. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that breach of duty of loyalty claim based on evidence that defendant was taking steps to compete with employer while still employed was not preempted
- “A statement is actionable if it implies a false assertion of objective fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Amundson, Konenkamp, Gilbertson, Johnson, Sabers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 64×
- In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-02-20· cited 57×
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-06· cited 56×
- Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-09-06· cited 46×
- Manuel v. WilkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-05-10· cited 27×
- Weins v. SporlederSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-06· cited 24×
- Long v. Area Manager, Bureau of ReclamationEighth Circuit· 2001-01-04· cited 22×
- Saathoff v. KuhlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-03-18· cited 18×
- Cotton v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 16×
- Aqreva, LLC v. Eide Bailly, LLPSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-10-28· cited 12×
- Arnoldy v. Mahoney & FinnemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-12-01· cited 11×
- Jutting v. HendrixSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-02-16· cited 6×
- John Morrell & Co. v. HalburN.D. Iowa· 2007-03-05· cited 5×
- In Re the Alcohol Beverage License Suspension of Cork 'N Bottle, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-11-20· cited 4×
- Drew v. StantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-12-08· cited 3×
- Weins v. SporlederSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-26· cited 3×
- Miller v. Huron Regional Medical Center, Inc.D. South Dakota· 2015-11-05· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 2001-01-04
- Harvey v. Regional Health NetworkSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-03
- Jed Spectrum, Inc. v. StoakesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-07-02
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 2,076×
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-10· cited 602×
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 469×
- Luther Haynes and Dorothy Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Incorporated, and Nicholas LemannSeventh Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 235×
- Unelko Corp., an Illinois Corporation Howard G. Ohlhausen v. Andy Rooney, an Individual Cbs, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-24· cited 140×
- Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.First Circuit· 1997-09-29· cited 139×
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 133×
- William Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1986-04-10· cited 121×
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 108×
- Partington v. BugliosiNinth Circuit· 1995-06-07· cited 93×
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-08-28· cited 90×
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-10-31· cited 81×
- Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-12-07· cited 76×
- Beverly Hills Foodland, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 655Eighth Circuit· 1994-10-27· cited 75×
- Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-03-10· cited 54×
- Laber v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 51×
- Uken v. SloatSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-09-17· cited 48×
- Ault v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-03-20· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.