Skip to main content
· 2/25/1980

Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Incorporated v. Malon S. Andrus, Inc.

Citations

  • 486 F. Supp. 1118
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting stay where defendants were under indictment and where stay was requested by district attorney
  • “[A] policy of freely granting stays solely because a litigant is defending simultaneous multiple suits would threaten to become a constant source of delay and an interference with judicial administration.”
  • “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
  • “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
  • “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
  • court rejected defendants’ argument of limited financial resources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward Weinfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.