· 2/25/1980
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Incorporated v. Malon S. Andrus, Inc.
Citations
- 486 F. Supp. 1118
- 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting stay where defendants were under indictment and where stay was requested by district attorney
- “[A] policy of freely granting stays solely because a litigant is defending simultaneous multiple suits would threaten to become a constant source of delay and an interference with judicial administration.”
- “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
- “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
- “That defendant’s conduct also resulted in a criminal charge against him should not be availed of by him as a shield against a civil suit and prevent plaintiff from expeditiously advancing its claim.”
- court rejected defendants’ argument of limited financial resources
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward Weinfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.