Skip to main content
· 6/1/2000

Paine v. Dickey (In Re Paine)

Citations

  • 250 B.R. 99
  • 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1021
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 843
  • 2000 WL 943770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an order reopening a closed case “was simply a ‘mechanical device’ that did not afford or deny the debtors any affirmative relief’
  • noting that bankruptcy appellate panel may raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte
  • debtors did not have standing to appeal order reopening case to allow creditor to file dischargeability complaint; debtors’ only interests were as potential defendants in adversary action that had yet to be filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marlar, Russell, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.