· 9/15/1836
Pain v. Perret
Citations
- 10 La. 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ALJ and VE failed to acknowledge conflict between testimony and DOT and no attempt was made to resolve the conflict
- ALJ and VE failed to acknowledge conflict between testimony and DOT and no attempt was made to resolve the conflict
- ALJ and VE failed to acknowledge conflict between testimony and DOT and no attempt was made to resolve the conflict
- ALJ and VE failed to acknowledge conflict between testimony and DOT and no attempt was made to resolve the conflict
- “[U]nder the substantial evidence standard of review, it is not enough for [P]laintiff to merely disagree with the ALJ's weighing of the evidence.”
- “[U]nder the substantial evidence standard of review, it is not enough for [P]laintiff to merely disagree with the ALJ’s weighing of the evidence or to argue that evidence in the record could support [her] position.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.