Pain Specialist Group, LTD. v. Micron Medical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that under our “system of dual sovereignty” state courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate federal claims
• holding that, when it is plain that the tribal court lacks jurisdiction, a party is not required to exhaust tribal court remedies
• holding that tribal court has no authority to regulate nonmember state police officers investigating an off-reservation crime at a residence which was on tribal land
• recognizing that under our “system of dual sovereignty” state courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate federal claims
• holding that jurisdiction under Enclaves Clause only lies for “on-reservation conduct involving only Indians” and that “State sovereignty does not end at a res- ervation’s border”
• deciding that tribal courts are not courts of general jurisdiction nor are tribal courts included in the historical and constitutional assumption of concurrent state-court jurisdiction to adjudicate claims arising under laws of the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).