Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2/16/1994
Paige v. State
Citations
- 45 Ark. App. 13
- 870 S.W.2d 771
- 1994 Ark. App. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant’s improbable explanations of incriminating circumstances are admissible as proof of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper, Mayfield, Robbins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-05-03· cited 83×
- Kendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-02-19· cited 16×
- LaRue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-04-03· cited 12×
- Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-03-27· cited 12×
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-12-09· cited 8×
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-09-11· cited 7×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1993-06-02· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.