Skip to main content
· 8/11/2009

Pagonis v. United States

Citations

  • 575 F.3d 809
  • 104 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5876
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17846
  • 2009 WL 2431980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the AIA as a “jurisdictional bar” and affirming dismissal of tax dispute claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
  • calling the Williams Packing exception a “limited situation, when the government’s claim of liability is without foundation, [and so] ‘the exaction is merely in the guise of a tax’”
  • “[T]he Supreme Court’s ruling in Flora [is] that full payment of an assessment is a prerequisite to a refund action”
  • \[T]he Supreme Court's ruling in Flora [is] that full payment of an assessment is a prerequisite to a refund action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bright, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.