· 8/11/2009
Pagonis v. United States
Citations
- 575 F.3d 809
- 104 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5876
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17846
- 2009 WL 2431980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the AIA as a “jurisdictional bar” and affirming dismissal of tax dispute claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
- calling the Williams Packing exception a “limited situation, when the government’s claim of liability is without foundation, [and so] ‘the exaction is merely in the guise of a tax’”
- “[T]he Supreme Court’s ruling in Flora [is] that full payment of an assessment is a prerequisite to a refund action”
- \[T]he Supreme Court's ruling in Flora [is] that full payment of an assessment is a prerequisite to a refund action\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bright, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.