Pagonis v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the proper inquiry [in a best mode analysis] focuses on the adequacy of the disclosure rather than motivation for any nondisclosure”
• stating that “hindsight analysis is inappropriate because obviousness must be assessed at the time the invention was made”
• explaining that “hindsight analysis is inappropriate because obviousness must be as- sessed at the time the invention was made”
• noting that “[ljongfelt need is closely related to the failure of others” but separately analyzing evidence of both in discrete sections
• noting that “[l]ongfelt need is closely related to the failure of others” but separately analyzing evidence of both in discrete sections
• rejecting a formal burden-shifting framework that would consider objective evidence only after a prima facie obviousness showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).